From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:04:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83eh70as37.fsf@gnu.org> <837gcrc10q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383357907 22901 80.91.229.3 (2 Nov 2013 02:05:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 02:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V. Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 02 03:05:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQaM-0002TG-HQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 03:05:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40426 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQaL-0002X0-V4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQaB-0002SM-C5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:05:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQa4-00011A-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:04:59 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:64680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQZw-0000vP-Aw; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:04:44 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXfu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXfu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="36910971" Original-Received: from 108-161-119-238.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([108.161.119.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Nov 2013 22:04:43 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EF78D660A2; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:04:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (T. V. Raman's message of "Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:17:41 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164843 Archived-At: > hear about an alternative -- note that I suspect > command-error-function might run into the same issue -- I don't think so: command-error-function will be called if and only if the normal (non-emacspeak) code would display a message, whereas advising `signal' leads to the problems you see, where some signals are "normal occurrences" that don't lead to any user-visible message because they get caught and handled by a `condition-case'. Stefan