From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: EWW buffers Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:27:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a93oh180.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h9xw9zg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83d28k9yb9.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppcj9740.fsf@gnu.org> <871toze1tl.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wq6rcidx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wq6r41b2.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416436088 9088 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2014 22:28:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ivan Shmakov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 19 23:28:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XrDjE-00026J-VW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:28:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32774 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrDjE-0001jL-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:28:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41612) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrDiu-0001gB-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:27:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrDin-0003gv-1R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:27:40 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:60649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrDim-0003fx-UY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id sAJMRUxF009455; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:27:30 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7CC948667; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:27:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87wq6r41b2.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> (Ivan Shmakov's message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:12:17 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5130=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5130> : inlines <1545> : streams <1345334> : uri <1835345> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177828 Archived-At: > It=E2=80=99s also perfectly possible to create that buffer but do /not/ > switch to it until it=E2=80=99s ready. Actually changing the displayed buffer from a process filter (i.e. asynchronously) is a bad idea, just like prompting the user. So yes, the *eww* buffer should be created and displayed right away (empty at first). Iceweasel does the same, FWIW, so I don't think it's a problem. Stefan