From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt. Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 08:47:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87oast997c.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87bnor3eyt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wq5u79nk.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418564903 5135 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2014 13:48:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , David Kastrup , Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 14 14:48:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y09Wx-0003YF-3q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 14:48:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36018 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y09Ww-0006ow-NB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 08:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y09Wd-0006oo-7F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 08:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y09WV-00068B-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 08:47:55 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:60851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y09WN-00066X-TC; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 08:47:39 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AskIAOwQflTO+ILA/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYMp3BAICgSQXAQEBAQEBfIQDAQEDAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiEoJ1lkBAQEHAQEBAR6QbweESAWLAaQugXiCBB6BdyGCdwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: AskIAOwQflTO+ILA/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYMp3BAICgSQXAQEBAQEBfIQDAQEDAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiEoJ1lkBAQEHAQEBAR6QbweESAWLAaQugXiCBB6BdyGCdwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,502,1413259200"; d="scan'208";a="101326346" Original-Received: from 206-248-130-192.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.130.192]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 14 Dec 2014 08:47:39 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EA763175E; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 08:47:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87wq5u79nk.fsf@petton.fr> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:23:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:180073 Archived-At: > That would be really nice. subr-x contains some extra hash-tables > functions already and I'm wondering how it should be dealt with without > implementing some functions twice if we were implementing a map.el > library. Should we keep hash-table functions in subr-x and simply alias > them in map.el or remove them from subr-x.el? That's a very minor issue, I think. Either way would work fine, Stefan