From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scan of regexps in Emacs (March 17) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:03:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5363970c-3207-1bb4-8b30-74a7d12277cc@cs.ucla.edu> <05269D79-B016-4FCB-94B8-068BF7D1C2D2@acm.org> <3974269b-6cad-0744-bd1f-66c067f94192@cs.ucla.edu> <86bm23f3bl.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="21957"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 22 15:25:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h7L6l-0005Xx-VJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:25:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58125 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7L6k-0006Lq-RD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7L49-00049i-Js for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7Ks1-0004Ly-Dq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=43794 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7Ks0-0004Bn-T4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h7Kry-000wim-Fv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:10:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:iUEajJJpudogf0hwKhnWJ6pwdxg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234571 Archived-At: > So putting it first is better. It does not conflict with putting `]' first; It does. > []-...] It's not first: it's second! And of course, if you go and add another char: []!-...] then it will fail as well, so having it "first" doesn't really protect it from the problem you encountered when it was last (tho admittedly, it does if you add a range rather than a single char). Anyway, for that shed I vote for green with pink dots, Stefan