From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Line height issues with display-line-number-mode Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 13:46:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6fd496f0-7dd5-6c0e-5121-b618e7dca831@gmail.com> <83sgtqi02k.fsf@gnu.org> <83r29ahyz2.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnouhwxs.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef59igzc.fsf@gnu.org> <83tve5ghyd.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnoshn0v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="137687"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 08 19:47:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQfH-000ZfS-4t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 19:47:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41020 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQfG-0002wb-6A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 13:47:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQe6-0002v5-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 13:46:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQe5-0004iA-Ja for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 13:46:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.201]:60195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQe5-0004h1-FK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 13:46:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (mail01.iro.umontreal.ca [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B758941E8E for ; Wed, 8 May 2019 13:46:19 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; h=content-type:content-type:mime-version:user-agent:in-reply-to :date:date:references:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from; s=dkim; t=1557337579; x=1558201580; bh=S5rfiGwWuW7Rt6BaFlzOAhyD ejWHP7zdYE2VEp37f1A=; b=fgKtFSzIXZGWGij0pflIMSwK7P0dORqBtVBAU4MQ y7xleqPJSbGqQ5E3jYoE13MpMdF6Wz9rpsL4x7z6SMdHWLrWFb4Psr8A/vHW9dK4 nW+l6ooSwk5dj/2gvc+2PqvS9S7sCP16pJJnTG1W1OCLD6I8vEROw8eu8oCeF7uE N3Xn1vNOgNtwOstztO/uGCTbYdVLxY60CbZfrOnxPG9pHJMUpXHM0lhxJmCyOAYr vS07nrs72zEd/73vKUQGozO9rDhhvF12+UIEcFzSEWVCgnf16yJyB/d5lT0zBn7Y zEUjUZXqXChyJxx0mTIQwxCMPEW1pBg5mgv7+f7+DraeRQ== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at iro.umontreal.ca Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (mail01.iro.umontreal.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Lrj6DvbU9kN for ; Wed, 8 May 2019 13:46:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from alfajor (modemcable213.149-175-137.mc.videotron.ca [137.175.149.213]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E557F8941E76; Wed, 8 May 2019 13:46:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83pnoshn0v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 08 May 2019 20:30:24 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.201 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236303 Archived-At: >> If it makes them smaller than without line-numbers, then it's indeed >> a problem, but I wonder why/when that would happen. > There are too many use cases related to display, I simply cannot be > sure I remember (or even know) all of them. I know the feeling. > Maybe you are right, and I'm haunted by a problem that doesn't exist. If it's easy to implement, we could just try it: Even if it turns out to make some cases worse, we do know it will make some cases better, so there's a good chance that it's a win overall. Stefan