From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: ob-haxe Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:01:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15129"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ian martins Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 20 05:03:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l24iG-0003pp-AF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:03:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l24iF-0000vV-BP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:03:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l24gD-0007w4-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:01:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:38072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l24gA-0007rx-Tl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:01:13 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 533E84404FC; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:01:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 225B4440330; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:01:08 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1611115268; bh=AwNwPcUpje5nS98G5+n94PyUoXiRgBGFvFGVQFpuO/I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZUNLMCqmacTAKq6YnjrA1KymGG5tr4RY2pvKimxps49fNqcDnZehymueeCtj8dtN4 dgxGV+LYQumwqJcYPHp9lgUmklV++wQiPHrxNgpJP2LR5py1QEOHSNs0sbbD1IsT5B ogqkw5sz/PwQiLJkV/hxHFRhlZUB/OIfW39D1ROxFTQwOPrbObdCaKY71wq/pJXz33 /D+b0ig8Pro0IWegDZa0Y5XV1yp8Fec8QhJcofS1xMdFDHZiT4N5StBmKGSzDSMzQQ K9gn87M5s9IH8gFP/oVxyq2qc1sF4Jwxha+0y1Jls3dd1XLIzI83VYrtdewdsNALX/ 9kQLqlx0MQUPw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.224.181]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5E5612027B; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:01:07 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (ian martins's message of "Tue, 19 Jan 2021 22:25:49 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263192 Archived-At: > That makes sense. Where there is shared code or variables it makes > sense to keep the implementations together. For the ob-haxe and > haxe-mode case the implementations are independent of each other. That's inevitably the case, given that they were developed separately. > I guess if haxe had a flymake integration it would want to share the > compiler name variable with ob-haxe, though. Yup, same thing if there was a REPL with an inferior-haxe-mode. > Do you think it would be better to merge the packages or just add a > dependency from haxe-mode to ob-haxe? Does it make a difference? The difference is the ease with which the two parts can share code. Stefan