From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 5183123: Add Tramp recompilation Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:02:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20210419095256.30298.23862@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210419095259.0651220FD4@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <878s59m0lq.fsf@tcd.ie> <87im4cnajz.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23163"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 23 22:04:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1la22J-0005tu-Rc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:04:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37878 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1la22I-0000G0-NN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1la20w-0008E8-Kx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:02:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:20513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1la20j-0001cU-FG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:02:56 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2309410021B; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:02:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 73C651000C9; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:02:41 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1619208161; bh=Prj5sAsnB/vUy8DEnJ4AQza4RQwkFP7JOsG5RJ54dsM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EGYvbtjJTfcm7y8W6KBIlv3jddniio0/pSjUHVvBhXmMzI5O9hTSnPX8Zt17xlWow 49qxLoGwvWTCA0AJOa7v4sQ7oWDk2MnhW4it+VR2w9FvU5bLF2214SCjIMieiAQXiQ +QBtkNVlaIde1LQoeV/ItOswfRoXMSX3GyH/FLm0kZBLUU+2SHnDkfJJymsQICKhSU uNHePuWHsNrJRXvqQwivJUiX86dOSP4UC5ejn8maKlGNFC0GmLnSlMpz9927Q4ndNs MrPix7qz3DY1UYOJtNc44qB3LuJzghT8f7tRtEYNfKf0ftOJuBEcqzUiX9cGGoRX6v 1tyVL/Y4VmHrQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (104-222-126-84.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.126.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ADF5120247; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:02:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87im4cnajz.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:02:56 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268327 Archived-At: >> My vote is to just make it non-interactive and move on. > This command is triggered by error report(s) on the Tramp ML. Scenario: > - Run an older Emacs version, say 27.2. > - Load tramp.el (this happens often, implicitly) > - Install Tramp 2.5.0.3 from GNU ELPA > > There is a compilation error, because the already loaded tramp-compat.el > does not fit the expectations of Tramp 2.5.0.3. I think we should treat this is a bug in package.el: we already have code to try and avoid such problems, so apparently it doesn't do its job in this case. >> [ Also, I don't see why we need `tramp-recompile-elpa`. >> I do see a need for `M-x package-recompile`, OTOH. ] > D'accord. Patches warmly welcome, Stefan