From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: updating async on elpa Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 09:06:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874kfom16w.fsf@posteo.net> <871rarn69c.fsf@posteo.net> <87y2czll5a.fsf@posteo.net> <87o8dvty56.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgxf5zyz.fsf@posteo.net> <87lf8zrqym.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35115"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 01 15:08:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpMD-000932-88 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 15:08:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54952 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpMC-000362-AH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:08:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpKl-0002e2-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:06:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:36448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpKi-0000pZ-Nj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:06:58 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 898C044070F; Sat, 1 May 2021 09:06:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2342B4406AD; Sat, 1 May 2021 09:06:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1619874414; bh=e/n0wa6V5BHHG+woJ0bX4wtlnDhsGs4dL81hXkMlAXU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=gCRWY0lHSJXcJhwgWKBhGIbXlTkTfiVPDZHTkYHTQg5ntDVzB9+AEfT3217kM6hAp JTYXi6YoTBe9ugHxM+qaLoQVxGAzI2ka3Y7MQCicSyWDa3PfmtN60UvtP43RncwECd 5bfJuCZlQwqlQE9bGDXCmCIMXK+8/+xC8yyfsqndPF/VReXHGkM7AN6nGvEJR+TTt6 +8QbX1Vb3jZa/RCuZqp3U28cqJJV9sOvetCv5py+NDY8y8D+yLQqTQLbwsb7Zur96R jS6kQTL1omAyvbZXZCfrbdi3cwM9ZBqfoFkEWReQuHQ1u5bqHPzuWrmJotBXXKaf0H rKqo78brM9QgQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [108.161.125.61]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E289E120192; Sat, 1 May 2021 09:06:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87lf8zrqym.fsf@posteo.net> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Sat, 01 May 2021 04:45:45 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268710 Archived-At: > Yes, the name I use -elpa- is bad, Really? It sounds like a genuinely natural and intuitive choice to me ;-) > but yes a repository per repo would be great, in github organizations > allow having one repo per package like in helm organization. I know it's more traditional and has its advantages, but currently it's not really an option. > What about ((emacs "24.4")) we don't care of 24.3, we are at 27.2 now so > very far from 24.3. ((emacs "24.4")) would work, yes. Whether that's better than ((emacs "24.3") (nadvice "0.3")) or even ((cl-lib "0.5") (nadvice "0.3")) is for the maintainers of Async to decide ;-) >> - The `async-pkg.el` which is absent on `elpa` and present on `master`. >> Do we actually need it on `master`? > IIRC yes, Melpa needs it. Why would it matter, since it's on GNU ELPA anyway? Stefan