From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] Add embark Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:20:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <878ryai7fe.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15159"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 31 05:21:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mh2LZ-0003mx-2X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 05:21:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mh2LX-00022o-O9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:21:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mh2KV-0001MU-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:20:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:12528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mh2KT-0008WN-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:20:22 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 883AC1002F2; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:20:20 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E1F34100135; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:20:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1635654018; bh=e104dQfMl9OCZqhpFamf7ZGVZDhe36NM3Ysws+CQxFw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=MpvVgPVEqoA5/Pa4Uq75VMgtOJ9WHiAOQc37RrsKkdD+xRay4kcL79oPbhFELZGun ZhHwZ6hIkO8tiIoX9T+t3RKT/uVmYlSJov+MI+DzbTE7TVO4BzoKgfV3EkcVcYbOC5 vnfmHFQSWrsJDb/xh4c3zreZNxDpeduygZu5q4Us0i8JB1/M0x06A8g16cP0ELInT7 RSgnOwQiuXbmMvxR8dqLtdIGmq4G+XI4JxYJpvNxre6D5z7rEsWnNKkwXimg+kvvdz c6l86y/XbAZVrV1US1/55YEKzOKjxX6H1Bg9ADEiA7Pz1cyGglUszBsK8NR8o/hNDE LQDs+1YCPPmFA== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [45.72.241.23]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E31321204BC; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:20:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <878ryai7fe.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Sat, 30 Oct 2021 20:28:21 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278299 Archived-At: > The only issue is that all but one contributor has signed the copyright > assignment[1]. Yet Protesilaos Stavrou claims his contributions do not > amount to a "significant contribution", and thus should not block the > addition of Embark to GNU ELPA[2]: [ At first I read the above to mean that Protesilaos was claiming that his own contributions were insignificant, implying that he was the last remaining contributor not covered by paperwork, which made me doubt my memory, so I went to double check and after finding that he indeed had signed the paperwork I finally re-read the above and understood what you meant ;-) ] Indeed, I confirm his analysis. Some of those contributions can still be traced to the latest code, but it's small enough to fall below the "trivial" threshold, IMO. Stefan