From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [nongnu] elpa/rainbow-delimiters a32b39bdfe: Add license file with GPLv3 Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 01:04:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <164107430330.17202.17260845381664886032@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220101215824.BB13CC0DEC3@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14232"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 04 07:06:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n4cy5-0003UM-Pu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 07:06:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54940 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4cy4-0002Ct-98 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 01:06:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4cw5-0001CP-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 01:04:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:16502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4cw2-0001fA-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 01:04:40 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 472EA1001C2; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 01:04:37 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D64AB1000F8; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 01:04:35 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1641276275; bh=FQ2z1VtZNB2FOFM+zlTrDCq1PDiTvEV47SKlsh5kjBg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=WXYa8o2dXgF8BsNgumKCHhBBHtAMcR9GIgVwQfbqXdGRdcs3hNUUfa+ee0jR2+/0j tgvz2WDv9RTq21ECt4AcaDLtTy7ah9x66qmjzAH41rTR6/7jD0K29BeMqgzSMBLtyR PL+g+3kYBFstrvEyEiW2svziMIB2P0n3+t6VJmasCnZobw12WcxfmB+rnaIOZZRoGh CaEnKXvD5mksv4oNnb7m8DBtDcTI/kGbcyYJLiDirOaH9NOxmwdHdRSbLoT21YCUKm F9sor908R3ywzqRHIppGb2F5TkYrAW2jNVoGhpADJruic3268VQ2X9tSurMue/Bx3H Kmvda1NhgnMLA== Original-Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E42C12024A; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 01:04:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Mon, 3 Jan 2022 23:04:15 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284125 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas [2022-01-03 23:04:15] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >>> ".github" and ".travis.yml" only makes sense in relation to >>> proprietary software, so I think arguably they are harmful. >> Fair enough. > BTW, I don't think you commented on test files, or did I miss it? > I think we should skip test files for the same reason as for the license > file. I think, just as for the license file, it depends on the case. If the tests are small enough, I see no need to skip them. Stefan