From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] New major-mode: bicep-ts-mode Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:20:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <7121354D-5D04-4B22-A0D3-54C469BF5B85@secure.kjonigsen.net> <87jzoldnpm.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <5ffdfca7-26b9-4331-975e-2e723e621cbf@secure.kjonigsen.net> <8734uyxzx8.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2991"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Stefan Kangas , Jostein =?windows-1252?Q?Kj?= =?windows-1252?Q?=F8nigsen?= , Daniel Mendler , "Ergus via Emacs development discussions." , Yuan Fu , Theodor Thornhill , Dmitry To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 15 20:21:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rPSWK-0000Xi-Ej for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 20:21:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPSVd-0003SV-JH; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:20:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPSVS-0003Os-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:20:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPSVQ-0007aC-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:20:21 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CA89A10009E; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:20:16 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1705346411; bh=fzAEyvBFlYqmMQfliy5VhZogLbsBGQUmEozx7Z146M4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=CqKOnvA84AtOWKAHhcpvBIxWMSHMgrE0SuQFgEhlOJfGiunu6eREg5PBDYrqh4VQI LUABMtANEbqOZPJjj4p2BHlix2mRJmSJpuHYh23XVQESguVJQ7ZQFxetmsYssBVW6N t+3bn8QWUo/dhikp9ILCoFySoMVJJieZHn53SAFUanYoMM/MpB8uPOHZ03UkZxC3zd ErgoQ8zNPEjWqkaslACr32yUN/DI3TBwd3hS926yd4T0+Yuc0AIKren5IWyrjlnv34 53Y3B6lwhiIJo5tdz0XNrkinHKjgxqjQKcW/nz/AeKv0mJEG3UppiGSWU8meoJ8R24 PYWGSCPzw8rbg== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 534FF10001D; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:20:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (65-110-221-238.cpe.pppoe.ca [65.110.221.238]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12473120454; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:20:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8734uyxzx8.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2024 17:35:31 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314992 Archived-At: > Did I miss something (see also <87bk9us421.fsf@posteo.net>), or what is > the reason for not taking the usual route of mirroring some external > repository, as is some with the vast majority of ELPA packages. I don't think you missed anything. What happened is that Jostein has already several packages in `emacs.git` so I assumed he had commit access, so I suggested to keep the new package in `elpa.git` which would save us from any mirroring (along with the risk of forking =F0=9F=99=82). But I have no objection to keeping it in some external repository like we do for most (but not all) other packages. Also, it can be changed easily later on, so it's really not an important decision. Stefan