From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: enriched-mode and switching major modes. Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:27:28 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200409042358.i84Nwjt19152@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <01c49c75$Blat.v2.2.2$7a37cb00@zahav.net.il> <01c49d70$Blat.v2.2.2$f7cfb860@zahav.net.il> <01c49da7$Blat.v2.2.2$cd5f7160@zahav.net.il> <01c49dc6$Blat.v2.2.2$3b624d40@zahav.net.il> Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CA9zs-0004Hc-00 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:29:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAA5s-0003Zr-57 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:35:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CAA5g-0003Zm-7S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:35:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CAA5c-0003Xx-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAA5c-0003Xu-Gu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:35:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CA9zA-0001Oi-Az; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:28:52 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507C0B30284; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:27:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B049A4AC1FE; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:27:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 50BC68CA23; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:27:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Oliver Scholz In-Reply-To: (Oliver Scholz's message of "Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:14:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5), n'est pas un polluriel (inscrit sur la liste blanche), SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27447 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27447 > Of course, if overlays work better: maybe they could be made more > efficient in the long run? Better ignore such efficiency issues at first. There's no fundamental reasons why a facility along the lines of overlays can't be made efficient. Stefan