From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: handle cygwin path from ldapsearch Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:57:46 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040921.174745.207589496.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> <20040923.134446.119720032.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095973119 1618 80.91.229.6 (23 Sep 2004 20:58:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 23 22:58:26 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CAafa-0002jS-00 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:58:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAalc-0005Al-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:04:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CAalU-0005AN-Q5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:04:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CAalT-00059q-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:04:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAalT-00059b-In for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:04:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CAafA-0002cq-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:58:00 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55681B30282; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:57:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627DD4AC073; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:57:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2F2888CA23; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:57:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Tak Ota In-Reply-To: <20040923.134446.119720032.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> (Tak Ota's message of "Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:44:46 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5), n'est pas un polluriel (inscrit sur la liste blanche), SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27512 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27512 > Could someone please take a look at this? I know it is not a very > high priority issue but the patch is not terribly complicated either. > If it looks reasonable please check it in. Thank you. Is this patch necessary on a cigwin build of Emacs? Is this patch necessary if you're using cygwin-mount.el? I.e. is this really specific to ldap.el ? Stefan