From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: invisible Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:57:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20040225.150142.12214540.kazu@iijlab.net> <200402290224.i1T2Oip15705@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87sl3fdqs3.fsf@escher.local.home> <87zlxc5r2f.fsf@escher.local.home> <474059CD.1060107@gmx.at> <87r6ihi1z7.fsf@escher.local.home> <4746E2CF.4010604@gmx.at> <87k5o8q0y5.fsf@escher.local.home> <4747312D.7020605@gmx.at> <87fxywpuuy.fsf@escher.local.home> <47474B8C.9020806@gmx.at> <87bq9kpnqd.fsf@escher.local.home> <4747EFE8.5090405@gmx.at> <474A7CF6.8030802@gmx.at> <474B19DB.6030803@gmx.at> <474C65FF.3070403@gmx.at> <474E93EC.9040909@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1196351847 29705 80.91.229.12 (29 Nov 2007 15:57:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen.Berman@gmx.net, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 29 16:57:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ixlld-00016G-Ta for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:57:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxllO-0003R4-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:57:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IxllL-0003Ql-5L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:57:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IxllJ-0003QH-N3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:57:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxllJ-0003QE-IJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:57:13 -0500 Original-Received: from bc.sympatico.ca ([209.226.175.184] helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IxllE-0002zd-Jd; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:57:08 -0500 Original-Received: from toip4.srvr.bell.ca ([209.226.175.87]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20071129155706.FXR18413.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip4.srvr.bell.ca>; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:57:06 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4HABpwTkdGN4zh/2dsb2JhbACBWw Original-Received: from bas1-montreal42-1178045665.dsl.bell.ca (HELO pastel.home) ([70.55.140.225]) by toip4.srvr.bell.ca with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2007 10:59:37 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0F4897F61; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:57:05 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <474E93EC.9040909@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:26:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84306 Archived-At: >> I think it would be good to start accumulating a list of test cases >> for which line-move and line-move-to-column have failed. >> Several times I've seen that fixing one case breaks another. >> Can you do that? > Currently, I don't have a test case where this fails with the > default value of `line-move-ignore-invisible'. All problems stem > from `line-move-ignore-invisible' nil. Hmm... I didn't notice that part. But then do they also appear with a line-move-ignore-invisible set to nil and a disable-point-adjustment set to t? I would guess not (this case being trivial). If so, maybe the solution is to do as I suggested: get rid of line-move-ignore-invisible and use (not disable-point-adjustment) in its place. Stefan