From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal. Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:46:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <961v6bom3j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87eiabdc04.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ipznhhe3.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87mxoz7mml.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874ob71y6v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4A76DA00C61D4637AC671E53FB7A4FCB@us.oracle.com> <87d3pvf5s2.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290610012 7393 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2010 14:46:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Julien Danjou , larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 24 15:46:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLGcS-0007sT-1R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:46:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55151 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLGcR-0005ZK-Ky for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:46:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60980 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLGcM-0005Yz-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:46:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLGcL-0004JQ-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:46:41 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:13495 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLGcJ-0004IU-W4; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:46:40 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkoJAAC07ExFxKB0/2dsb2JhbACheH9yvmKFRwSEW41s X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,248,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="83438601" Original-Received: from 69-196-160-116.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.160.116]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 24 Nov 2010 09:46:38 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AD886660DC; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:46:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:35:23 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133117 Archived-At: > Perhaps we could all stop being apologetic and pointing fingers at one > another, and see one important lesson to be learned here: that before > adding a package to Emacs, the contributor should talk to the head > maintainers about where the new package should be and whether it > should be a new one or an addition to an existing one. Agreed. And the other side of the coin is that rather than complain about a new package that not included the way we want it, we should welcome the new addition and drool over the synergistic opportunity to merge it with some other package [yes, maybe I'm pushing it a bit, but I'm sure you see what I mean]. Stefan