From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexbind ready for merge Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:29:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877hbhxe12.fsf@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301495409 23445 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2011 14:30:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 16:30:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4wPI-0004up-6e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:30:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34608 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4wPG-0007UX-2z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:29:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37543 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4wP7-0007Pt-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:29:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4wP1-0006AZ-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:29:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:24311 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4wP1-0006AN-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:29:43 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAF49k01MCo6K/2dsb2JhbAClUHiIebRzhWoElhY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,269,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="98662551" Original-Received: from 76-10-142-138.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.142.138]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Mar 2011 10:29:42 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2223158B95; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:29:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <877hbhxe12.fsf@member.fsf.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:28:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137914 Archived-At: > The reason is that in trunk, that function has the signature > byte-compile-from-buffer (bytecomp-inbuffer &optional bytecomp-filename) > but in the lexbind branch, the optional bytecomp-filename has been > removed: > byte-compile-from-buffer (inbuffer) > AFAIKS, gnus doesn't use the foo.el file anyway, so basically that arg > can be removed. But maybe the `byte-compile-from-buffer' definition in > [[S]X]Emacs requires exactly 2 arguments? I don't know... Why on earth does Gnus need to call byte-compile-from-buffer? Stefan