From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Memory leak due to bidi? Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:18:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312381122 5579 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2011 14:18:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Moreton , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 03 16:18:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QocHO-0007r7-CE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:18:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51219 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QocHN-0007ZW-Sd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:18:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33464) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QocHH-0007We-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:18:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QocHG-0000f0-Q3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:28344 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QocHF-0000eg-Fm; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:18:29 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAOpXOU5FxKfe/2dsb2JhbABCp194gUABAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSHf8BkhkIEn0qEMQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,310,1309752000"; d="scan'208";a="128533727" Original-Received: from 69-196-167-222.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.167.222]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 03 Aug 2011 10:18:28 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D9CC2660CF; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 10:18:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 03 Aug 2011 09:44:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142813 Archived-At: >> I've given up on using VC annotate in emacs after 10 minutes of bzr >> thrashing my machine with zero output. > ??? "time bzr annotate src/character.h" shows this for me: > real 0m21.802s > user 0m20.430s > sys 0m0.650s > That's not long enough to be annoying, let alone 10 minutes of > thrashing. What am I missing? Thrashing slows the process tremendously, so the 10 minutes are probably due to thrashing. And thrashing is most likely due to Bzr using more memory than Andy has on his machine. Stefan