From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r108646: * minibuffer.el(read-file-name-default): Bind `non-essential' to `t'. Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:59:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k3z5ouz1.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340046344 15495 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2012 19:05:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Michael Albinus' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 18 21:05:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SghGf-0007xo-0M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:05:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40083 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SghGe-0004Ls-Un for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SghGc-0004Ld-0L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:05:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SghGZ-0004Sg-K5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:05:37 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:50767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SghGZ-0004SH-G7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5IJ5Vww009428; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:05:31 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8FE3FB430C; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:59:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:58:20 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4254=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4254> : streams <769858> : uri <1142754> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150994 Archived-At: > I think that for most users most of the time, the completions shown by > Icomplete act mainly as background help. They are not "essential", > and most users (or at AFAICT, the behavior in the test-case is the same with or without icomplete, so this is not about icomplete (and icomplete already sets non-essential, which indeed is the right thing to do). Stefan