From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET non-regression bug fixes Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:57:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k3tprzss.fsf@engster.org> <876258rp28.fsf@engster.org> <87sj8ar6fg.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353074287 25555 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2012 13:58:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:58:07 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 16 14:58:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TZMQx-0007ce-2T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:58:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55719 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZMQn-0005ds-9N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:58:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZMQi-0005cZ-FN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZMQf-0004uq-D3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:58:00 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:18512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZMQf-0004um-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:57:57 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09sr+ZY/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYoCws0EhQYDYhABboJjSaDHgOIQppxgViDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="207764351" Original-Received: from 108-175-230-88.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.175.230.88]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 16 Nov 2012 08:57:56 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D552158BDA; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:57:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87sj8ar6fg.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:51:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154879 Archived-At: >>>> We need to do something to avoid those problems. AFAIK there's no >>>> reason to ever prefer get-file-buffer over find-buffer-visiting, so >>>> maybe we should simply get rid of get-file-buffer and make it an alias >>>> of find-buffer-visiting. >>> Oh, you have my vote for that. >> Great! How much (time and effort) are you willing to contribute to >> my campaign? > Can't I just give you money? If you want to give me money additionally to time and effort, that's fine, yes. > Anyway, do you plan on actually replacing all `get-file-buffer's? "Plan" is a big word here. But if someone could take care of making get-file-buffer an alias of find-buffer-visiting (and checking that it doesn't introduce any obvious problem), that would be appreciated. Stefan