From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:19:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83eh70as37.fsf@gnu.org> <837gcrc10q.fsf@gnu.org> <52769DD6.1040002@poczta.onet.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383608551 1082 80.91.229.3 (4 Nov 2013 23:42:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jarek Czekalski , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V. Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 05 00:42:35 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VdTn0-0004zT-UK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:42:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52533 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdTn0-0006vg-Fz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:42:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdTmq-0006vE-8k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:42:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdTmi-0004WK-VI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:42:24 -0500 Original-Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:21773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdTmi-0004WF-Rn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:42:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([24.202.58.40]) by VL-VM-MR004.ip.videotron.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-22.01 64bit (built Apr 21 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MVR00EXRJ6GR750@VL-VM-MR004.ip.videotron.ca> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:42:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9C3AD6609C; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:19:06 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 24.201.245.36 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164947 Archived-At: > It doesn't work with the recommended means of using add-function No, that will be the recommend way once command-error-function does not default to being nil any more. But as long as it's nil, add-function can't be used with it. Stefan