From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:59:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427234396 26254 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2015 21:59:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 24 22:59:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWrB-0008DB-Cw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:59:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34720 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWrA-0005YJ-Op for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWqv-0005Y3-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:59:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWqs-0002oc-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:59:13 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:15957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWqs-0002oS-3v; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:59:10 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAGvvdVTO+KpL/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiBOiEYxkCQMBAoM+A4NwBKNjhFg X-IPAS-Result: AgUFAGvvdVTO+KpL/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiBOiEYxkCQMBAoM+A4NwBKNjhFg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,1,1400040000"; d="scan'208";a="114491026" Original-Received: from 206-248-170-75.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.170.75]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Mar 2015 17:59:10 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5534F1F4A; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:59:09 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:57:26 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184188 Archived-At: > I think that C-x v v, when it commits changes, should also push them. No, instead VC should offer a vc-push command. > This would make git more comparable to other version control systems. You mean like Bazaar, Mercurial, etc... who also distinguish between "commit" and "push"? > Does anyone see a reason not to? That would try to pretend that we still live in the CVS days, but these days are gone. The new normal is to commit and push separately (even if Bazaar provides the notion of "bound" branch to try and let you pretend that they're not separate). Stefan