From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [patch] generator function optimizations Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:53:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489355754 21753 195.159.176.226 (12 Mar 2017 21:55:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:55:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 12 22:55:49 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cnBSt-000508-DF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:55:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48555 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnBSz-00055K-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:55:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45537) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnBSP-00055E-F6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnBSM-0004jS-CL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51403 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnBSM-0004j9-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:55:14 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cnBSB-0000Pi-52 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:55:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:oxEuiqcOp9POWD0EOl6I2B/Glhs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212962 Archived-At: >> Have you tried to measure the impact of your patch on the actual problem? > I mentioned 3%. That's the percentage impact on the number of lambdas. I'm curious about its impact on actual problematic aspects, such as speed and code size (and compilation time, I guess). > Yes, it is practically negligible, but this is a first small patch and > I'm willing to work on improving generators further. Of course. Stefan