From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: new-flex-completion-style Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:54:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20190202232827.27331.87300@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190202232828.4AE452159A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lg2mynrg.fsf@gmail.com> <87wolwvn8k.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="32684"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 19 13:54:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gw4v9-0008NP-Sb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:54:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47653 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw4v8-0000X8-M7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:54:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52415) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw4uz-0000Vy-U1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:54:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw4uz-0001IZ-5B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:37114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw4uy-0001Fb-9U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x1JCsOdP019352; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:54:25 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D5CE166196; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:54:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vora=22's?= message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:16:27 +0000") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6486=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6486> : inlines <7018> : streams <1813489> : uri <2798812> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233451 Archived-At: > Yep, and does the right thing default-wise, too. If I'm not mistaken, > I'd say it behaves exactly like ido-switch-to-buffer now, which doesn't > use score-based sorting, when icomplete-mode is used with the > new flex completion style. ;-) > BTW, has the council of completion elders reached any sort of > white-smoke decision vis-=E0-vis where to score-sort? It's been too foggy around here lately to see much smoke, sorry. >> I think a more precise description would be that cycle-sort-function now >> also overrides the use of minibuffer-history-variable. > That's in the commit message's subject line, but OK I've changed it. Who reads the first line anyway? [ After reading that first line: ] but that didn't make it clear that the change is about the use of minibuffer-history-variable (the only part which used to prevail over cycle-sort-function, AFAICT). Stefan