From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:40:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <875zalolt7.fsf@bernoul.li> <87v9ikmmly.fsf@bernoul.li> <87imeal72x.fsf@bernoul.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10298"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jonas Bernoulli Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 26 16:41:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jzhpt-0002am-H1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 16:41:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46968 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzhps-00014h-II for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzhpI-0000bi-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:40:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:13700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzhpG-0004M2-PM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:40:32 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5484C44081E; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:40:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D9CBA440812; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:40:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1595774427; bh=bO6XRpscL9+KvH/MRYPEz9xGtlShO3kTVN0MrJtlVf4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=I0XMSVE0uLEzZp80QhRQoOvcDQe8TfRDXq3owLA6w9B7Efe3Wc0Shm58jpZ+YmMV8 D1f1UuCb33OfjHLm9q+iIVxMtppdkX3fiJtgGtPz2C2Wv8NIFCOW5V/czQw/pRR+mw jn7ui706qDjqs7R6YGYcvXcMEN1Ldgmkjo0j0hEJ+aW1Kbh1sWyYH/caBOCHoHaGzl Ao4tTJ9+/ImcrFR2XG/3oe75takGVfbh97XacG/av+g8oM7DPhj0+PlEzBRPykcmXf LH+1rdxkzrlw62MDcCQYp1wiUl8umJfGD7fJb1iKcrINKJLoWEO07Qu9jmIKTZSUuh vob573kM0/2MQ== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [104.247.229.155]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A92691207B2; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:40:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87imeal72x.fsf@bernoul.li> (Jonas Bernoulli's message of "Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:49:26 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/26 10:40:29 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253256 Archived-At: > Personally I would also recommend that people use a "back matter" > section similar to the "front matter" section that is ";;; Code:", but > I fear my preferred heading for that, ";;; _", might not find too many > fans. But then again, I might be wrong, what do you think about ending > with this instead: Indeed, I don't much like `;;; _` simply because it is non-descriptive. Could we try and find a good name for those sections? What do you put in those things (other than file-local vars)? Stefan