From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: search-invisible and friends Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:10:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zh5z9l9y.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15263"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 09 17:12:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1le-0003sj-J5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 17:12:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47794 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1ld-0000od-DV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:12:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1kE-0007rG-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:5393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1kC-0003L2-JX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6B919440F67; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:10:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C67E5440F4D; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:10:40 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1599664240; bh=Cl0cbiS9hulTcpao+snEInTSXwoYjW7TEr46YdyhpDU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lwdCjxUP+eeYw0UlSUjFkFoNcyCgk0q+oOS+255YtncPPrcSy5F/oD+Ky1HF2Exrb itbv9Bz/qNRrK52R0jSIHKi8nD7mtpC4iZCyIZXkibQHyWrJo3GyfaBIE7K+jZGHsi hfe0ZZi4A6WU6iMDI+TB4D3gKHRKoiLI0sss8Z5RF0+0YQY7quUZzYiMUHnzhJajmn 2dgxuRMEF67S4K2A1YOrxGSUtSEiZyWH/g3Q9UsHTIzeZN/e5sTpaxickQrlqr8Mox +j2y79Q+AdXBiZO77fJBTeNiUwYkaJdhNtW3f2+0uBiEu2YpjCgzulPBsdwJ4NiGqg PQANaB+rnV0QA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.232.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A72D1201E4; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:10:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87zh5z9l9y.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:39:37 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/09 11:10:42 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254882 Archived-At: > Does Emacs have this functionality somewhere? If not, I think it > should, and perhaps (or perhaps not?) by piggy-backing on the > search-invisible variable. It'd be very natural to extend the current behavior to also ignore text that's hidden via `display` rather than via `invisible`, but please be careful not to consider all `display` properties as hiding the text, since some do and some don't (not sure which is the official definition of which do and which don't. Maybe `display_prop_intangible_p` does the trick?). Stefan