From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:03:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20210727211521.15408.98852@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210727211523.AE6F72065F@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <877dhabg5s.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgu6h0e1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a6m6tn0e.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1figz3p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zgu4ri8b.fsf@gnus.org> <837dh8s6fj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3495"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , juri@linkov.net, leungbk@mailfence.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 31 00:04:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9abt-0000jO-O7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 00:04:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46080 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9abs-0005MV-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9ab1-0004Zh-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:53471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9aay-0002Hi-31; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EF1ED100221; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:03:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4F7221001E8; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:03:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1627682584; bh=fVTBR/SLWpRPTTfNRQTQTgg/4s9ATa9rf8Tzty43X+E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Gy+waO2CBr5W7/iCR8J+pD1wH8e1wPcGTzz24e4DPwkTNumwH/WKgbVtcUSwHWr+Q YGDcMBkNDhYilrKsObZK7AAPbTIRpL8rhh2CUTGOSUgtyNeUbNwxtLnlErOFsAJLOt ZrRuo0F6fYaytiXn92H2h/vb77Vb/CCzxsVRJq+BNvM/wGJhfp2t+OWwD/bj/w9+Tv wGKWcDCi9CGczt4adsMCuRGHxOQxyp6D1s1HwtVwoAYYPaySMRJWCOgCh+YTka6+Hn wDpXG/eloKgzQlERhUj3ROdItHCz/DGGG3ujUPJtHkEah1VLCu1gTgI7CU281rv9Rj c1y4X9ZCQdmig== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6051120177; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:03:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <837dh8s6fj.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:43:12 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271879 Archived-At: > Stefan, any comments/suggestions? It definitely makes sense to use the "FILE:TXT" warning format for that warning (after all, we do have the file name). I don't think we can usefully put a line number info there, but a 0 should do the trick. Note also that these aren't compilation warnings, instead they're emitted by the `autoload.el` code. The effect of those problems is quite minor: it affects the info we compute which maps command/var prefixes to files (so that `C-h o` completion can automatically load files to find a var/function). I think we should aim to fix those warnings because they reflect a bad namespace behavior on the part of the file, but it's not super important. Stefan