From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confusing doc string of list-or-string at point Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 13:41:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83a6k3uspt.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfxv2p4e.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <835yururh3.fsf@gnu.org> <8335pvuqfh.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuibyxzd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83y27nt9ny.fsf@gnu.org> <87czoz3wm2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875yuqpjpp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20270"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 24 19:54:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTpOh-00055J-5Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:54:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43588 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTpOe-0007FR-H3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 13:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTpCg-000128-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 13:41:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:18667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTpCd-0000Dn-B0; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 13:41:41 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A89D680675; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 13:41:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 00B4D80182; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 13:41:34 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1632505295; bh=+8gRKRuDNUTKJxLNcanEdqLh88U4XzCQpKyYIMQ/aQs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=AjI5nAdYfvKCvFRk1av8Ddr9Avu9oK8AJW5EFl0KN2iVsw+wVPqj+ij3vyXPb0Y9/ o5t5cDU/7r266VWWAMsJKUDdI+Sr5ZkNxWqmK80nM4BO0Q31tMMzSacfuiNLpDFjbo QNlZGCbJFPledhBYYPYPAK6JB2/XSJuzE/GHlictq5BGPFOuIh3u4j8GWXi1v8COjt I3JqIUJdYtu3P8+IRilTKfXKYr+RQgyFzvkVyE2dZYzvI8DYmsuv9xp+r0MmNbONsB R07pwDjbQYK5t6R26LmUrfaT6yLjToFM3ChSmeK67Qg6pfhJAkyMQll4q8z6+/mL85 s/7tzjTqkEBdg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.241.23]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C194B12004D; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 13:41:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <875yuqpjpp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:32:18 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275411 Archived-At: > (defun thing-at-point--end-of-sexp () > "Move point to the end of the current sexp." > - (let ((char-syntax (syntax-after (point)))) > + (let ((char-syntax (char-syntax (char-after)))) Splitting the work between `char-after` and `char-syntax` means that we can't obey any `syntax-table` text properties placed on that char. So I think the above change would be a regression in this sense (tho I understand it fixes or circumvents a bug elsewhere). Stefan