From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Speeding up the bootstrap build - a quick hack. Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:29:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83y23cu9bl.fsf@gnu.org> <835yqgt0bf.fsf@gnu.org> <835yqfsln1.fsf@gnu.org> <87fspilpx5.fsf@gmail.com> <87bl06lf54.fsf@gmail.com> <877daulaoq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2801"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Robert Pluim , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 21 01:34:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAhsz-0000Qo-O6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 01:34:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAhsy-0006iz-Mp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 19:34:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAfvo-0003Dk-O9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:29:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:10311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAfvm-000444-8Q; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:29:23 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B02BD805EE; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:29:19 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5B38B8030B; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:29:18 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1642717758; bh=5O4YmD5lhl748Np+isjhXI8HMmeA3ftmmR9XwWdDmBQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=MM+JY5x6XdsPWT5LBrg5bObLnC0KrVSTA5N2BsHXKnvtv9pSCYyPZXS7qUDYFdLPm 0tHVo4HVXIRduXn4CqUpeNabVZCWowo74TximDsNzcyVjnspoGfEuMxBcZQP5jnTXB D4YG6jR9tQeyJ5zrfoHzKyp7kCl4L56feMB78RpRJeBKEBhdIFy0+dqhZfsVnG2mrx qNcWvv7YfCTuvFOb1WbiGXPprpAfBgpOniBYa7r+ix0aP75NL2JJLnSj+oG/bx67yN FgTYvg5DrnU7I8WVQn018kUyh0Tg0RkCSqeKaoJlFUptYC+vqWM83amkY5Y3an1/ci Pv0vymUTSANfA== Original-Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2884F1208F3; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:29:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:48:09 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285063 Archived-At: >> touch -t 197001010000 emacs-lisp/macroexp.elc >> make[2]: emacs-lisp/macroexp.elc: Timestamp out of range; substituting >> 2514-05-30 03:53:03.999999999 > > That's very strange. It looks like a funny overflow, or something. > Never mind, it's not too important. But thanks for the heads up. Could it just be one of those timezone issues (the timestamp is provided in local time, and depending on the timezone, I guess this could correspond to a UTC time in 1969). Stefan