From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f117b5df4d: Add new functions eol and bol Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:02:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <166091536530.20326.14174671546998200051@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220819132245.AE2BBC0088A@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87a680v004.fsf@gnus.org> <875yiouzhd.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6337"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 19 23:04:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oP9AQ-0001PK-Qz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 23:04:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45130 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oP9AP-0002o6-PL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:04:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oP98Y-0008TR-Ne for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:02:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:26127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oP98W-0003Xi-2y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:02:37 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 488BB8045E; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:02:34 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A9F9080664; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:02:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1660942948; bh=P+ORqZ0zYfJX7xQ1gbBdNot3jpGhfZZSZhA4Ytev/TQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=N1oLrFQ2jVNHwV2RiM2PLEU/gKcAMvuF0GJydOBw0uU3LCiulRAM8Dz43TyyxTbpo IMuxu+u16PSFgdZpphfx0kRSS/cue9wg9uapS+hYXEQZAjOrkjhG8buyje0bBOpRoz rPSaDxQgF1kXnH8f2VrcLMAaISzyRwGStfB5+4LepdPD5FKIPZEpiwCD9CiV6eBN/4 eaaBMgmMKspumbtz1lRwS34NpUtxD+jvc/H2F0fc1jnWB1ovgaYqKCZrcQoY+1FoNk RTW6Vs9uJ6hZfUv1YzTnWfdvVZ8iDX7rtvTYs353XrzmnuVStQxmzXTzRrUe105eNU dpTLOnibKUkCA== Original-Received: from lechazo (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B6AD12043B; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:02:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <875yiouzhd.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:36:30 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293648 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen [2022-08-19 15:36:30] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >>> Bikeshed welcome about the names, though. I considered `point-bol', for >>> instance, but that's very similar to `point-at-bol' (which is an alias >>> for `line-beginning-position'). >> >> I suggest `point-at-bol` (i.e. stop making it an alias). > That'd change the behaviour, though. (`point-at-bol' is used > extensively both in-tree and out of tree, since that was the original > name for the function.) But `point-at-bol` is a function imported from XEmacs where they don't have fields, AFAIK. Stefan