From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: patch for documentation about version control Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:34:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87vfce289d.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100036108 31297 80.91.229.6 (9 Nov 2004 21:35:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 21:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alex Ott , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 09 22:34:43 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CRddR-0008IG-00 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 22:34:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRdlq-0002Bk-D6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:43:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRdlj-00029N-2l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRdli-000284-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:43:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRdli-00027y-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:43:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CRdd2-0004KP-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:34:16 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF5A8282A3; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:34:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D114AC935; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:34:14 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 85DBD8CA69; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:34:14 -0500 (EST) Original-To: kfogel@red-bean.com In-Reply-To: <87vfce289d.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> (Karl Fogel's message of "09 Nov 2004 12:21:34 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29674 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29674 > "The GNU project recommends RCS, CVS, and GNU Arch which are > free software...", > some readers could mistakenly infer that the other systems are *not* > free software. And because of that lead-in, the next sentence about a > free replacement for SCCS only strengthens the misimpression. I'd also suggest we don't recommend RCS any more. Stefan