From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improvements to `(emacs)File Variables' Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:47:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878y942l8h.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <20041114232600.GA12968@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100796491 32537 80.91.229.6 (18 Nov 2004 16:48:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, overlord@gmx.li, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 18 17:48:01 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUpRx-0002O6-00 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:48:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUpao-0004Ke-8j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:57:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUpaf-0004KY-PV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUpaf-0004KM-CL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUpaf-0004KJ-AC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUpRZ-00041h-B5; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:47:37 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1060C82828D; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:47:37 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DF74AC05E; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:47:32 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 46DB18CA69; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:47:32 -0500 (EST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:55:38 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30028 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30028 > I will not deprecate unibyte mode without polling the users. Let's not forget that the original question in this thread is whether we should *add* more documentation for the "unibyte:t" cookie. I think we can answer "no" without formally declaring the feature obsolete (after all, it is already documented at other places, so we don't need to advertise it further). Stefan