From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tex-mode binding of C-return Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 15:14:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115071038 4565 80.91.229.6 (2 May 2005 21:57:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 21:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 02 23:57:12 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DSiud-00043Z-00 for ; Mon, 02 May 2005 23:57:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DSj08-0000RK-AX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 18:02:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DSgS8-0007H6-8A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 15:19:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DSgOf-0005cJ-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 15:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DSgOK-0004k1-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 15:15:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DSgRp-0006sI-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 15:19:17 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36709340004; Mon, 2 May 2005 15:14:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D174AC23C; Mon, 2 May 2005 15:14:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B0734E6C18; Mon, 2 May 2005 15:14:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Mon, 02 May 2005 13:25:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-4.838, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.06, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36605 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36605 > Since my plan (after the release) is to separate the rectangle > handling from CUA, having a good "toggle rectangle mark" command > will eventually become important even for non-CUA users. > C-return is such a "good command", analogue to C-SPC for the > normal mark. I don't find C-return a particularly good choice (especially since it doesn't work on ttys). But to tell you the truth, it's hard to judge without the whole context (i.e. what would be the interface for that new rectangle handling thingy?). Is the idea that to kill a rectangle you could do C-RET C-SPC .... M-w or equivalently C-SPC ... C-RET ... M-w > Do tex users really use C-return ? At least I don't. Stefan