From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:41:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <18695.5574.107271.711561@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <18696.5661.523071.167994@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <18696.11434.978893.578213@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225291405 2176 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2008 14:43:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ulrich Mueller , Diego Petteno , emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs@gentoo.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 29 15:44:26 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KvCH5-0003AS-7r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:43:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35541 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvCFy-0001MX-Om for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvCEQ-0000hz-IW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:41:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvCEP-0000hS-OY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:41:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54017 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvCEP-0000hL-KS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:25349) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KvCEP-0006Kr-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:41:09 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUEAFMTCElMCqyo/2dsb2JhbACBdstjg1GBDg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,506,1220241600"; d="scan'208";a="29012224" Original-Received: from 76-10-172-168.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.172.168]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2008 10:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2F7258E6F; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:41:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:37:06 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105144 Archived-At: >> You really want to optimise this? ;-) > It's a psychological optimization. Every time I see that 100 I look at > the code to see what I'm missing. 96 would be even worse, because it > does look meaningful. >> Ulrich (voting for 42) > 42 is fine :-) Please just leave it as 100. The rest of the code uses 100 everywhere. Otherwise, define a macro (which you can set to 42 if you really insist) and use it everywhere. Stefan