From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: buffer-swap-text and multibyteness Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:10:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234361978 24865 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2009 14:19:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 11 15:20:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LXFwe-0002B8-4K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:20:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58410 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXFvK-0003Mu-6E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:18:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXFne-00016X-6D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:10:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXFnX-00013V-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:10:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60484 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXFnW-00013H-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:10:43 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:63875) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXFnT-0001gQ-S8; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:10:39 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApkFAMxqkklFxIvi/2dsb2JhbACBbtIbhBoGgyQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,192,1233550800"; d="scan'208";a="33708721" Original-Received: from 69-196-139-226.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.139.226]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2009 09:10:39 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 067EA7FE6; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:10:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:01:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108984 Archived-At: >> >> >> In my poiunt of view, the way "edit" should work is that it should >> >> >> basically be put into `message-mode' and then "saving" would simply >> >> >> encode the whole message (as if preparing to send it). >> >> > I'm not sure this isn't an overkill. >> >> >> >> Not sure why you'd think so. >> >> > When did you last look at the code you were describing? It does a lot >> > more then just encode the message and add/rewrite the Content-Type >> > headers. >> >> But... why do you think this "a lot more" is not needed/useful in the >> case of rmailedit? > Because rmailedit never sends any message, so it does not need most of > that stuff. I still don't know what you're referring to. What does it do extra that rmailedit.el wouldn't need? Stefan