From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Google modules integration Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:28:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878w3a1x9s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <871v92yuul.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284208236 841 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2010 12:30:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Julien Danjou , emacs-devel@gnu.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, carsten.dominik@gmail.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 11 14:30:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuPE2-0006rT-Lo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:30:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OuPE1-0003fp-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:30:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59569 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OuPDv-0003ew-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:30:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuPDu-00058l-Q3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:30:27 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm3.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.3]:49300) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuPDu-00058Z-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:30:26 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost4.adm.correo ([10.20.102.125]) by IMPaqm3.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id 5KWg1f0042iL0W23PQV2vL; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:29:02 +0200 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([83.61.39.212]) by IMPmailhost4.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id 5QUz1f00B4aeRwb1kQV0aQ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:29:01 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-TE-authinfo: authemail="monnier$movistar.es" |auth_email="monnier@movistar.es" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 98716660D2; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:28:59 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:29:56 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129974 Archived-At: > We should have the same rules for ELPA as Emacs. The idea is that > anything in ELPA should be ready for integration into Emacs if we want > to do so. Agreed except in terms of integration and code quality. Stefan