From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current state of python.el in the Emacs trunk Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:03:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4D40F55C.2040400@gmail.com> <874o85t61z.fsf@liv.ac.uk> <87y65hukcj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <86r5b8llwc.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc66ky5s.fsf@liv.ac.uk> <861v2y9cz1.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301410567 18209 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2011 14:56:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph , Chong Yidong , Dave Love , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: ken manheimer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 16:56:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4aKn-0000ke-Em for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:55:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51364 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4aKl-0007y7-47 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:55:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41965 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4ZxJ-0002MR-SN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:31:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4ZVq-00049i-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:50414 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4ZVq-000497-RI; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:03:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAAnmkU1MCqRC/2dsb2JhbAClTHiIebwqhWoElhA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,262,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="98501045" Original-Received: from 76-10-164-66.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.164.66]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 29 Mar 2011 10:03:14 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B123558EBD; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:03:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (ken manheimer's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:58:39 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137852 Archived-At: > prospect. however, pdbtrack does seem to be present in the versions of > python.el that come with Emacs 23 on the various systems i use, so i'm > hopeful it's been adopted and will continue to be. There's no plan to remove it, indeed. Its global impact is a bit problematic but that's no argument for removing the feature since it's not a bug of the implementation but is part of the intended UI. Stefan