From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap deleted DOC-nnn file Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 08:48:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83vc6rb31c.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9o2at0z.fsf@gnu.org> <834ne9brlz.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2su846k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368535733 20550 80.91.229.3 (14 May 2013 12:48:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 12:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: yandros@MIT.EDU, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 14 14:48:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UcEew-0005dB-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 14:48:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35021 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcEev-0001ab-Pk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:48:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcEer-0001a5-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:48:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcEep-0004sC-CU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:48:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:1929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcEem-0004rX-Vp; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:48:41 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rwb8/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgaxH5AOkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rwb8/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgaxH5AOkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="11981651" Original-Received: from 184-175-6-252.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([184.175.6.252]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 14 May 2013 08:48:35 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DFBE5678C8; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:48:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83d2su846k.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 14 May 2013 09:29:39 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159569 Archived-At: >> If there is a single DOC file, which we don't bother to remove > You probably mean "which we recreate every time", because etc/DOC is > removed as part of a bootstrap (and even when DOC is rebuilt because > it's outdated). Right? Sure. We could also just leave it, since I don't think it can do much harm. The point is that it won't be "gone for ever". Stefan