From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage. Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 04:16:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83oba22ymd.fsf@gnu.org> <6B4F86F0-164D-4CBE-8CD2-9BC9326451C4@swipnet.se> <8361w93k8e.fsf@gnu.org> <871u6x4we0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <58D8CF7D-C157-4D48-93B4-2EFFAA4AAF61@swipnet.se> <8338rd2q1h.fsf@gnu.org> <534E99D7-CC13-4C8D-A80B-EC00995F741A@swipnet.se> <83txjt15hw.fsf@gnu.org> <83li550z3l.fsf@gnu.org> <87ip072t8d.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83vc46zwsy.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374308193 28904 80.91.229.3 (20 Jul 2013 08:16:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 08:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 20 10:16:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V0SLC-0007QF-51 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:16:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58381 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0SLB-0001tX-Li for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 04:16:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0SL8-0001tQ-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 04:16:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0SL6-0001n2-Tq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 04:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:60216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0SL5-0001mH-DP; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 04:16:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r6K8GND5026719; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 04:16:24 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 78263AE2E1; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 04:16:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83vc46zwsy.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:08:45 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4644=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4644> : streams <1003320> : uri <1481861> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162031 Archived-At: >> AFAIK, and I expect that fairly few users use the features that >> require timers (jit-lock-stealth and jit-lock-defer). > I expect most of them do use timer-dependent features all the time. Why? Stefan PS: jit-lock-defer is actually not in the same boat since it only uses an idle-timer, so it doesn't keep firing over and over again while Emacs is idle for long periods.