From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-dynamic-module in Emacs Git? Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:05:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wq6tu5m5.fsf@kima.orebokech.com> <85h9xwhpy9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87k32sh50f.fsf@lifelogs.com> <85tx1rg64e.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org> <87siha7r3b.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lhmz4mtj.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sih575rc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8361dyaqf1.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjb771px.fsf@gnu.org> <851tojm0z6.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <838uiq7m8b.fsf@gnu.org> <85d281jbgn.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83iohs62id.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417633597 10778 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2014 19:06:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 19:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 03 20:06:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwFFn-0004tZ-GD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 20:06:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42949 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwFFn-0004ZB-2F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwFFc-0004Z4-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:06:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwFFU-0007RG-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:06:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:18590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwFFM-0007Oe-JV; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:05:56 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcQAOwQflRMCqTq/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYIVawUuDUgQCAoEkFwEBAQEBAXyEAwEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIhKCdZZAQEBBwEBAQEekG8HhEgFiwGkLoF4hBkhgncBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AhcQAOwQflRMCqTq/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYIVawUuDUgQCAoEkFwEBAQEBAXyEAwEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIhKCdZZAQEBBwEBAQEekG8HhEgFiwGkLoF4hBkhgncBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,502,1413259200"; d="scan'208";a="99484590" Original-Received: from 76-10-164-234.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.164.234]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Dec 2014 14:05:56 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D094788E1; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 14:05:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83iohs62id.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 03 Dec 2014 19:56:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178749 Archived-At: > What you suggest is a very slippery slope. If we agree to such an > unlimited exposure of internals, I'm quite sure that before long we'll Luckily we don't agree with such unlimited exposure. It's not up for debate. The only thing still up for debate is what should be included in the API. Stefan