From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Additional network security Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:43:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417805020 4402 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2014 18:43:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 18:43:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 05 19:43:33 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwxqm-0000hX-9T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 19:43:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52019 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwxql-00045r-UC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:43:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwxqa-0003t7-Du for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:43:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwxqS-0005Zp-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:43:20 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:14795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwxqS-0005Zi-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:43:12 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjsPAOwQflRMCqTq/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYIVaxR0EAgKBJBcBAQEBAQF8hAMBAQMBVigLCzQSFBgNiG4J1lkBAQgCAR+QdhaEMgWLAaQugXiEGSGCdwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: AjsPAOwQflRMCqTq/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYIVaxR0EAgKBJBcBAQEBAQF8hAMBAQMBVigLCzQSFBgNiG4J1lkBAQgCAR+QdhaEMgWLAaQugXiEGSGCdwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,502,1413259200"; d="scan'208";a="99658268" Original-Received: from 76-10-164-234.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.164.234]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Dec 2014 13:43:11 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7FEDB87F8; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:43:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:10:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178984 Archived-At: > Perhaps it might make sense to allow users to specify high-grained > security policies? I don't see much need for it. Emacs should mostly follow the default choices of the GnuTLS library. Stefan