From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 24.5 second release candidate Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:45:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87619fvb9s.fsf@blueberry.home> <87384juhme.fsf@blueberry.home> <87zj6qtzch.fsf@blueberry.home> <20150402140228.GB23848@acm.fritz.box> <87y4matwhd.fsf@blueberry.home> <837ftuqzrm.fsf@gnu.org> <20150402161950.GD23848@acm.fritz.box> <83384iqw8h.fsf@gnu.org> <20150402173116.GE23848@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428011182 25929 80.91.229.3 (2 Apr 2015 21:46:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 21:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 02 23:46:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YdmwF-0005bY-7K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 23:46:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60242 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdmwE-0001Uv-J8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:46:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdmwA-0001Ud-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ydmw9-0004qa-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:52969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ydmw5-0004q9-Cl; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t32LjvfL000850; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:45:58 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6F8766610A; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:45:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20150402173116.GE23848@acm.fritz.box> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:31:16 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5264=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5264> : inlines <2602> : streams <1415939> : uri <1896903> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184806 Archived-At: >> > I think Stefan means bug #19669. That's right. > I think the problem is years old, but has remained hidden because of > something that the fix to #19669 uncovered. Or something like that. I tend to agree. The recent discussion about how jit/font-lock bounds work leads me to think that the misunderstanding probably results in many different bugs that just happen to occur rarely because usually the bounds computed by font-lock-extend-after-change-region-function end up passed mostly unmodified to font-lock-fontify-region. Stefan