From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp's future Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:52:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <86k2dk77w6.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <642fd4b4-8b1c-a537-5a5f-6940691ec4b9@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475844839 29716 195.159.176.226 (7 Oct 2016 12:53:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:53:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 07 14:53:55 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsUeu-0006xg-Ch for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:53:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsUet-0002sl-18 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:53:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsUei-0002rT-Eu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:53:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsUef-0005eN-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:53:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=33274 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsUef-0005ay-3L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:53:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsUeM-0002os-5y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:53:18 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:NJXH+D/N838OwWXjDnbk4dRQbfY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208060 Archived-At: > The big benefit I see is being able to replace the lisp engine with a more > standard one, and thus benefit from performance enhancements / bugfixes / > etc from the other engine. That's right. Any change would be motivated by the desire to benefit from other people's efforts w.r.t implementation of the language and of its libraries. Stefan