From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Trimming strings, /emacs/lisp/emacs-lisp/subr-x.el modification Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 13:44:23 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87vapij1l7.fsf@holos> <6870A2B6-F685-4955-9C0A-256601DB47BC@gmail.com> <51D5E92C-F125-4ADE-8C55-E3513C00ECDC@gmail.com> <8F6958D6-3E13-4C31-B1F8-AF10A8FC8FC6@gmail.com> <0d4cb885-4bea-44d5-8a19-5b77773db563@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494092708 24203 195.159.176.226 (6 May 2017 17:45:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 17:45:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 06 19:45:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d73lR-0006EX-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 19:45:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52267 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d73lW-0008It-Ul for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 13:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d73kx-0008Io-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 13:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d73kt-00080z-8z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 13:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=35849 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d73kt-00080o-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 13:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d73kk-0005TT-Fg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 19:44:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:C0Tm3IR41xygrDRbNpYBPmvqV74= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214627 Archived-At: > The code will be byte-compiled. I see zero reason why these > functions should be defsubsts. The reason, AFAIC is the following: subr-x holds functions which we haven't committed to adding to core. We exceptionally allow them to not use a prefix but in return we only use subr-x while compiling (since it's fundamentally not namespace-clean and we don't want to impose those non-clean names upon the unsuspecting user). Stefan