From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 12:13:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <831s0xd3z1.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnohbhny.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="257239"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Noam Postavsky , Emacs developers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 18:20:45 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRfbA-0014nv-D3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 18:20:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRfb9-0001PC-D4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:20:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRfU2-0004PQ-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:13:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRfU1-0008NK-28 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:13:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:28751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRfTy-0008L1-PP; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:13:18 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EBD384425E8; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:13:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail02.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DEBAE4425E5; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:13:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1558109595; bh=R3EGwpcIgsdK5U9Gp54GHCZdb2yM0EscCQBRtQYwrS8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZFJSkIpm1RUPEs9UE9G9lqbV9EuFWdIiOkiqaJqfdaLXIzrvl8qwyCV/59cEBYBhd AsLLRaEMdgRJBXz9ZJ0TwRC/w/dVyX/VnkWAfJss4KWPSuDP3KweTBxpxUuBD8NxYB i2NH9rpWHWrV9bhrf/bXlNfcWEAzpqy1490iqCXaX9XHiIg8RYdlTsDNM22PSSd22G Fw28NzJ5EL5XsmKWW/xpzs7MigMnmlWDHrbDCLMYEd6v/Q/bYZND7+Zbnbu0vIHYT5 pufkMJVBD3kKm5cByWkm9sQZkg/8a4R7jb7gaheZRViDozUDTbDii6W71ywQGucSII Nk0NmAIgtUCjg== Original-Received: from ceviche (184-175-13-248.dsl.teksavvy.com [184.175.13.248]) by mail02.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABD12120173; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:13:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 17 May 2019 15:41:36 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236677 Archived-At: > But this means that as of present, if you have an obsolete function in a > file, and you call it from a function defined before that obsolete > function, you won't get the warning, so this seems like a bug... Note that if a function/variable FOO is defined as obsolete in file BAR, then I think we'd ideally want to silence all warnings for uses of FOO made within BAR. Stefan