From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 23:51:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20191110031420.yosogxfr6kgrctwn.ref@Ergus> <20191110031420.yosogxfr6kgrctwn@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="246890"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Rajeev Narang via \"Emacs development discussions.\"" To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 10 05:51:47 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTfCU-00127L-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 05:51:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTfCT-0008BL-KV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 23:51:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTfCL-0008B6-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 23:51:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTfCK-00009r-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 23:51:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:22727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTfCK-00009n-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 23:51:36 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1678A1009ED; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 23:51:36 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9F68B1002E2; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 23:51:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1573361490; bh=K67GuwoxkA/bHdKWvKwyviELtZsyw0VO/YbeSfQ8ywo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GO+vt96AvsBMAYTA8u6cOhoTth0DRde78Ouoxrm4ZID+uwgRRvv8fFhhjkxQnUNzR jlV1pypm5dItPh8GaBXbpDJzscW+JNBUdk/xm8rKzJXZVKFi7zQAEYcxaT64UuJXX6 pxBvGs05Hjxgng57ymn3MrYfujez7eT1AuPld6rqBtS0Nl+Ry3/JHUlpIjDcxvF59y sxU7ipG244zORrfMMRW5Q3/bDgYoBvLN40eoYxeMUXYiKvrX7SBkcSwHwWi9d29KjN W6fk45L/EXvmsXdHQdMB4V9az9N89z5vYY0UhX8glUZJ3OvgklcdsZd7hiNt0kWR5g Rp6NVeOilRu1A== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.27.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 664B8120298; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 23:51:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20191110031420.yosogxfr6kgrctwn@Ergus> (Ergus's message of "Sun, 10 Nov 2019 04:14:20 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242067 Archived-At: > Why, if we have ibuffer (which looks better than the list-buffers), it is > not the default for C-x C-b? Because list-buffers was there (long) before and ibuffer is not a simple drop in replacement (it has a different UI, for one, and I'm not completely sure that it is a strict superset w.r.t features). It's a long standing problem, indeed. Stefan