From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 18:21:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <831ro2tqqx.fsf@gnu.org> <4a1fd3f4-df92-c756-9874-4d07b54148ac@yandex.ru> <3bd09dca-dcdc-7569-e5fb-f6b53397af9d@yandex.ru> <83bln6s5on.fsf@gnu.org> <6d43996b-65ab-0bc6-9124-156520396910@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="39596"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 03 00:22:19 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0WY-000A9d-2A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 00:22:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45850 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0WX-00039Q-5P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:22:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0Vx-0002VR-3r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:21:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0Vw-0006J1-Oq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:21:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:26760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0Vu-0006EC-Rp; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:21:38 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 429B681189; Sat, 2 May 2020 18:21:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 69F5280063; Sat, 2 May 2020 18:21:35 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1588458095; bh=krutrXCOUbGXZ8A6wslMtsUdeXt42uUKBvQT7kosDdo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Kx9/XCMaJ/XaVPNv7ZK66M27tuvDks16G9xKJjMCgNUGAqUfhDSOTQhofPSOnd9Mb rRGzKfiqfUXLeeuyHj4mGNxMRToV9mReIKTBscaykglZYavT5rAJvLWEXPC7eoj9vJ yrJ4fpJl+oey/1RkVZllZf9ZSlF0QGIvm5KfdndvV4AgljinVJU126vWjHnTOxDdSa HirCYqxbgHG3VCs+DBj5x8UEZOmARRNLKoZi2c/uPQ6p50r1cE6yZ2+OG6zQw2shBT 5ZDHTaZzf5q9j01in4QvRTyGR50xL4AhhDYMgcVCxniYXejdGm/uAdf5SxxRTBbL2e 3YvUh5L46jgkQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.3.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA3651203AB; Sat, 2 May 2020 18:21:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 2 May 2020 15:03:10 -0700 (PDT)") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/02 16:40:06 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248600 Archived-At: > If all string manipulations are to have prefix `string-' No we will never put *all* string manipulation under the "string-" prefix, simply because there's no way to precisely define what is "all string manipulation". We know that we can't classify everything correctly. So we feel free to use "all" to mean something closer to "most" or "those where it's clear". Stefan