From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master ce4ec17: Fix display-buffer-override-next-command to call action only once (bug#39722) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:48:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200621233622.23590.68753@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200621233623.C811520A26@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lfkgj5tk.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874kr24p5l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zh8txsdc.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87wo3w9ftf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h7uug7n9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lfk5mrj4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="48269"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 30 04:49:28 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jq6Ku-000CTE-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 04:49:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35046 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jq6Kt-0003xR-4X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jq6KL-0003Wb-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:48:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:2470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jq6KJ-00029G-K8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:48:53 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AE62A440B5F; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:48:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1D833440A3E; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:48:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1593485329; bh=e7Qbl+xNdGQ1V1HyXZKLhiHrEGvDtfLPFeCnEeTwn0w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DcN1vo4za+FkmKIaJtnBpRc4zlmI8Q913vgngFq70QjATlvgUNMQoPVm/Q5x7hCE3 9AzNChzyvgXeMx7Gncq77WRUKNncmQHHJiSmZPXXDGQ5XnkVoJepSQlYVp36A5njAu ym9Qc9QhtDqg80Y0mK5YpQrOrxWzyUUjbq6wL5fKkSJ0pek4q50iX+yPOjRnhDn2mW /rRohsRwH/JkwyzYL7FpSWd1tXeO30fddf1tszhibx4+QVVqgnhCCgBgQDdaLnDJ4a 2AOI8HdJE8e7PxzotDXuFaEyOtPC9p7g5mo0yauwkSKqDNXApnerbYgdG+kmTK0/UA SD1fefaVatzgw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.0.200]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D71EB12089B; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:48:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87lfk5mrj4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:43:03 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/29 22:35:25 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252578 Archived-At: >>>>> I'd rather try and avoid this complexity because I think it will become >>>>> problematic as more prefix commands get written. E.g. the ordering >>>>> problem doesn't only affect `C-u` but all other prefix commands, such as >>>>> `C-x RET c` (there currently aren't others bundled with Emacs, but there >>>>> are others out there). >>>> Hmm, I didn't know that set-buffer-file-coding-system supports a prefix arg: >>>> `C-u C-x RET f`. >> Not sure how that relates to the previous paragraph. > I just discovered a prefix command that supports a prefix arg. > This doesn't mean of course that it should set a precedent > for other commands to follow. AFAIK `C-x RET f` is not a prefix command. >> Since I use `C-x 4` instead of `C-x 4 4`, I'd say that `C-x 1` would be >> the "natural" choice, but that's also already taken :-( > But you can still use `C-x 4 1` as a submap of your `C-x 4` map where commands > of the submap will display the buffer in the same window. Hmm... maybe `C-x 4 1` is a good choice for `same-window-prefix`. Stefan