From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: verilog-mode.el Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:22:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <47111236.5020402@verilog.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192418604 6481 80.91.229.12 (15 Oct 2007 03:23:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wsnyder@wsnyder.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, mac@brushroad.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 15 05:23:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IhGXv-00025T-U6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:23:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhGXp-0007ar-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhGXm-0007Xn-56 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhGXk-0007VP-Oo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhGXk-0007VI-KX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:23:00 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts25.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.188] helo=tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IhGXh-0008KV-B9; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:22:57 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.55.141.81]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20071015032256.DXFL19497.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:22:56 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3797C7FED; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:22:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun\, 14 Oct 2007 21\:36\:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80893 Archived-At: > - Emacs-21's comment-region and uncomment-region should work correctly > (including mangling nested comments, although in a different way from > the one you chose). > Is that a suggestion for them to change something? Or is it a > statement that something is good does not need to be changed? Both > meanings seem plausible. But I cnnot tell what the something is, > in regard to verilog-mode.el. It's suggesting that verilog-comment-regiont and verilog-uncomment-region can (probably) be dropped when running under Emacs>=21 (and the C-c C-c binding could also be removed if you assume your users will use M-;) Stefan