From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sparse key maps garbage? Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:19:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <48B9DB4A.5010203@gmail.com> <48BA8BE1.7010006@gmail.com> <48BA9700.9080401@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220206769 31313 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2008 18:19:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 31 20:20:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZrXB-0007OC-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:20:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34720 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZrWC-0002bL-Sy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZrW9-0002ac-E0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:19:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZrW8-0002a4-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:19:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38846 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZrW8-0002Zf-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:19:16 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:22538) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZrW8-0007pr-4U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:19:16 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjYFAK99ukhFxJrH/2dsb2JhbACBZbVMgWmBBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,302,1217822400"; d="scan'208";a="26172637" Original-Received: from 69-196-154-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.154.199]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 31 Aug 2008 14:19:15 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2D77FB41E9; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:19:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <48BA9700.9080401@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:05:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103329 Archived-At: >> Depends how you define "un define a key". Binding it to nil is such >> a way. Binding it to `undefined' is another. Removing the binding from >> the keymap is yet another (one that does not come with a ready-to-use >> function for it). > I am thinking of the last case. Shouldn't there be one for this case? > Using exactly the same parameters as define-key (minus the binding)? What do you need it for? Stefan