From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: frame-environment Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:48:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232243338 12741 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2009 01:48:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 18 02:50:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LOMnT-0003kU-1i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:49:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46968 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LOMmC-0003Ok-5W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:48:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LOMm4-0003NE-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LOMm3-0003MY-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43795 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LOMm3-0003MU-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:48:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:24384) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LOMm1-0005Yo-Iw; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:48:25 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar0EAK8YcklMCpxj/2dsb2JhbACBbM0RhXOCAw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,282,1231131600"; d="scan'208";a="32464002" Original-Received: from 76-10-156-99.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.156.99]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2009 20:48:25 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C6B8A87B9; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:48:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:08:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107948 Archived-At: > What's the story with this function? It doesn't exist, AFAICS, and > its two uses (in `environment' and `read-envvar-name') are commented > out. It doesn't exist. > Without this function or something similar, the FRAME argument to > `environment' has no effect. Unless this is for future extensions, > I'd suggest to remove it now, before it's too late. I'm not sure how to remove it since it doesn't exist, but yes, it should be removed. As for the `environment' frame-parameter, we can drop it if we want, or at least rename it to server-environment (tho a more precise name would be confusingly server-client-environment). Stefan